Casey

Nothing new here, just rehashing what we have.



May I first direct you to the 13 part series that originated on the "calling" aka alNeda website:

The In the name of Allah Most Gracious Most Merciful
The crusade is on Iraq

__________________
~Casey

The current ItsHappening forum is here:
http://wincoast.com/forum/index.php

WorldAnalysis.net
http://worldanalysis.net

Casey

__________________
~Casey

The current ItsHappening forum is here:
http://wincoast.com/forum/index.php

WorldAnalysis.net
http://worldanalysis.net

Casey

__________________
~Casey

The current ItsHappening forum is here:
http://wincoast.com/forum/index.php

WorldAnalysis.net
http://worldanalysis.net

Casey

__________________
~Casey

The current ItsHappening forum is here:
http://wincoast.com/forum/index.php

WorldAnalysis.net
http://worldanalysis.net

Casey

__________________
~Casey

The current ItsHappening forum is here:
http://wincoast.com/forum/index.php

WorldAnalysis.net
http://worldanalysis.net

Casey

__________________
~Casey

The current ItsHappening forum is here:
http://wincoast.com/forum/index.php

WorldAnalysis.net
http://worldanalysis.net

Casey

__________________
~Casey

The current ItsHappening forum is here:
http://wincoast.com/forum/index.php

WorldAnalysis.net
http://worldanalysis.net

Casey

__________________
~Casey

The current ItsHappening forum is here:
http://wincoast.com/forum/index.php

WorldAnalysis.net
http://worldanalysis.net

Casey

Report Cast Doubt on Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection

washingtonpost.com
Report Cast Doubt on Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection
By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, June 22, 2003; Page A01

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...-2003Jun21.html

In a nationally televised address last October in which he sought to rally
congressional support for a resolution authorizing war against Iraq,
President Bush declared that the government of Saddam Hussein posed an
immediate threat to the United States by outlining what he said was evidence
pointing to its ongoing ties with al Qaeda.

A still-classified national intelligence report circulating within the Bush
administration at the time, however, portrayed a far less clear picture
about the link between Iraq and al Qaeda than the one presented by the
president, according to U.S. intelligence analysts and congressional sources
who have read the report.

The National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq, which represented the consensus
of the U.S. intelligence community, contained cautionary language about
Iraq's connections with al Qaeda and warnings about the reliability of
conflicting reports by Iraqi defectors and captured al Qaeda members about
the ties, the sources said.

"There has always been an internal argument within the intelligence
community about the connections between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda," said a
senior intelligence official, who, like others interviewed for this article,
spoke on condition of anonymity. "The NIE had alternative views."

Similar questions have been raised about Bush's statement in his State of
the Union address last January that the British had reported Iraq was
attempting to buy uranium in Africa, which the president used to back up his
assertion that Iraq had a reconstituted nuclear weapons program. In that
case, senior U.S. officials said, the CIA 10 months earlier sent a former
senior American diplomat to visit Niger who reported that country's
officials said they had not made any agreement to aid the sale of uranium to
Iraq and indicated documents alleging that were forged. Details of that CIA
Niger inquiry were not shared with the White House, although the agency
succeeded in deleting that allegation from other administration statements.

Bush, in his speech in Cincinnati on Oct. 7, made his case that Iraq had
ties with al Qaeda, by mentioning several items such as high-level contacts
that "go back a decade." He said "we've learned" that Iraq trained al Qaeda
members "in bomb-making and poisons and deadly gases." Although the
president offered essentially circumstantial evidence, his remarks contained
none of the caveats about the reliability of this information as contained
in the national intelligence document, sources said.

The presidential address crystallized the assertion that had been made by
senior administration officials for months that the combination of Iraq's
chemical and biological weapons and a terrorist organization, such as al
Qaeda, committed to attacking the United States posed a grave and imminent
threat. Within four days, the House and Senate overwhelmingly endorsed a
resolution granting the president authority to go to war.

The handling of intelligence on Iraq's banned weapons programs and its links
to al Qaeda has come under increased scrutiny on Capitol Hill, with some
leading Democrats charging that the administration exaggerated the case
against Hussein by publicizing intelligence that supported its policy and
keeping contradictory information under wraps. The House intelligence
committee opened a closed-door review into the matter last week; its Senate
counterpart is planning similar hearings. The Senate Armed Services
Committee is also investigating the issue.

Bush has defended his handling of intelligence before the war, calling his
critics "revisionist historians."

"The intelligence services of many nations concluded that he had illegal
weapons, and the regime refused to provide evidence they had been
destroyed," Bush said in his weekly radio address yesterday. He vowed to
search for "the true extent of Saddam Hussein's weapons programs, no matter
how long it takes."

Questions about the reliability of the intelligence that Bush cited in his
Cincinnati address were raised shortly after the speech by ranking Democrats
on the Senate intelligence and armed services panel. They pressed the CIA to
declassify more of the 90-page National Intelligence Estimate than a 28-page
"white paper" on Iraq distributed on Capitol Hill on Oct. 4.

In one of the more notable statements made by the president, Bush said that
"Iraq could decide on any given day to provide a biological or chemical
weapon to a terrorist group or individual terrorists," and added: "Alliance
with terrorists could allow the Iraqi regime to attack America without
leaving any fingerprints."

Bush did not indicate that the consensus of U.S. intelligence analysts was
that Hussein would launch a terrorist attack against the United States only
if he thought he could not stop the United States from invading Iraq. The
intelligence report had said that the Iraqi president might decide to give
chemical or biological agents to terrorists, such as al Qaeda, for use
against the United States only as a "last chance to exact vengeance by
taking a large number of victims with him." And it said this would be an
"extreme step" by Hussein.

These conclusions in the report were contained in a letter CIA Director
George J. Tenet sent to Sen. Bob Graham (D-Fla.), then the chairman of the
Senate intelligence panel, the day of Bush's speech.

While Bush also spoke of Iraq and al Qaeda having had "high-level contacts
that go back a decade," the president did not say -- as the classified
intelligence report asserted -- that the contacts occurred in the early
1990s, when Osama bin Laden, the al Qaeda leader, was living in Sudan and
his organization was in its infancy. At the time, the report said, bin Laden
and Hussein were united primarily by their common hostility to the Saudi
Arabian monarchy, according to sources. Bush also did not refer to the
report's conclusion that those early contacts had not led to any known
continuing high-level relationships between the Iraqi government and al
Qaeda, the sources said.

The president said some al Qaeda leaders had fled Afghanistan to Iraq and
referred to one "very senior al Qaeda leader who received medical treatment
in Baghdad this year." It was a reference to Abu Mussab Zarqawi, a
Jordanian. U.S. intelligence already had concluded that Zarqawi was not an
al Qaeda member but the leader of an unaffiliated terrorist group who
occasionally associated with al Qaeda adherents, the sources said.

As for Bush's claim that Iraq had trained al Qaeda members in bomb-making
and use of poisons and deadly gases, sources with knowledge of the
classified intelligence estimate said the report's conclusion was that this
had not been satisfactorily confirmed.

"We've learned," Bush said in his speech, "that Iraq has trained al Qaeda
members in bomb-making and poisons and deadly gases." But the president did
not mention that when national security adviser Condoleezza Rice had
referred the previous month to such training, she had said the source was al
Qaeda captives.

The CIA briefed congressional committees about the National Intelligence
Estimate but did not deliver the classified version until the evening of
Oct. 1, just before a Senate intelligence committee hearing the next day,
congressional sources said. At that closed-door session, several senators
raised questions about qualifying statements made in the report, which was
circulated only among senior national security officials.

On Oct. 4, three days before the president's speech, at the urging of
members of Congress, the CIA released its declassified excerpts from the
intelligence report as a "white paper" on Iraq's weapons programs and al
Qaeda links. The members wanted a public document to which they could refer
during floor debates on the Iraq war resolution.

The white paper did contain passages that hinted at the intelligence
community's lack of certitude about Iraq's weapons programs and al Qaeda
ties, but it omitted some qualifiers contained in the classified version. It
also did not include qualifiers made at the Oct. 2 hearing by an
unidentified senior intelligence official who, during his testimony,
challenged some of the administration's public statements on Iraq.

"Senator Graham felt that they declassified only things that supported their
position and left classified what did not support that policy," said Bob
Filippone, Graham's deputy chief of staff. Graham, now a candidate for the
Democratic presidential nomination, opposed the war resolution.

When the white paper appeared, Graham and Sen. Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.), an
intelligence panel member and at that time chairman of the Armed Services
Committee, asked to have additional portions of the intelligence estimate as
well as portions of the testimony at the Oct. 2 hearing made public.

On the day of Bush's speech, Tenet sent a letter to Graham with some of the
additional information. The letter drew attention because it seemed to
contradict Bush's statements that Hussein would give weapons to al Qaeda.

Tenet released a statement on Oct. 8 that said, "There is no inconsistency
between our view of Saddam's growing threat and the view as expressed by the
president in his speech." He went on to say, however, that the chance that
the Iraqi leader would turn weapons over to al Qaeda was "low, in part
because it would constitute an admission that he possesses" weapons of mass
destruction.

On Oct. 9, the CIA sent a letter to Graham and Levin informing them that no
additional portions of the intelligence report would be made public.

SMOKEY

F L A S H B A C K


The Al Qaeda Connection: Saddam's links to Osama were no secret.
by Stephen F. Hayes
The Weekly Standard
5/12/2003

OOPS. In what could go down as the Mother of All Copyediting Errors, Babil, the official newspaper of Saddam Hussein's government, run by his oldest son Uday, last fall published information that appears to confirm U.S. allegations of links between the Iraqi regime and al Qaeda. It adds one more piece to the small pile of evidence emerging from Iraq that, when added to the jigsaw puzzle we already had, makes obsolete the question of whether Saddam and Osama bin Laden were in league and leaves in doubt only the extent of the connection.

In its November 16, 2002, edition, Babil identified one Abd-al-Karim Muhammad Aswad as an "intelligence officer," describing him as the "official in charge of regime's contacts with Osama bin Laden's group and currently the regime's representative in Pakistan." A man of this name was indeed the Iraqi ambassador to Pakistan from the fall of 1999 until the fall of the regime.

Aswad's name was included in something Babil called an "honor list." Below that heading, in boldface type, came a straightforward introductory comment: "We publish this list of great men for the sons of our great people to see." Directly beneath that declaration came a cryptic addendum--included by accident?--in regular type: "This is a list of the henchmen of the regime. Our hands will reach them sooner or later. Woe unto them. A list of the leaders of Saddam's regime, as well as their present and previous posts."

Then comes the list of regime officials. It is in alphabetical order until, halfway down the page, it starts over with officials whose names begin with the letter "A." It includes Baath party leaders, military heroes, ambassadors, intelligence chiefs, the commander of the "Saddam Cubs Training Center," governors of Iraqi provinces, chemical and biological weapons experts, and so on.

U.S. intelligence experts have not conclusively determined what the list means. One possible explanation they have entertained is that part of the list came from an opposition source, and that Babil republished it as a gesture of defiance. This would account for the reference to "henchmen of the regime" whom "our hands will reach"--to say nothing of the candid description of Aswad's duties.

Sounds plausible. But that explanation leaves unanswered one important question: Why would the regime, at a time when it was publicly denying any link to al Qaeda, publish anything admitting such a link?

Even if the identification of Aswad in the Babil list was nothing more than an embarrassing editorial oversight, several recent developments have bolstered the Bush administration's case that Saddam Hussein had connections to the al Qaeda leader.

On April 28, senior administration officials announced that the United States had captured an al Qaeda terrorist operating in Baghdad. The operative is believed to have been an associate of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a top al Qaeda figure who plotted the assassination of Laurence Foley, an American diplomat gunned down in Jordan last fall. Zarqawi is also believed to have received medical treatment in Baghdad after he was wounded fighting U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

That arrest came shortly after U.S. troops patrolling the Syrian border captured Farouk Hijazi, long believed to have been an outreach coordinator of sorts between the Iraqi government and al Qaeda. Hijazi, formerly a high-ranking Iraqi intelligence official, has confirmed to U.S. officials that he met Osama bin Laden in Sudan in 1994. He denies meeting with al Qaeda officials in 1998, but U.S. officials don't believe him. At that time, a leading newspaper in Rome reported that Hijazi traveled to Afghanistan on December 21, 1998, to offer asylum to bin Laden. The Corriere della Sera described Hijazi as "the person who has been responsible for nurturing Iraq's ties with the fundamentalist warriors since 1994."

Back then, reports about a budding Hussein-bin Laden partnership were not limited to the foreign press. Newsweek magazine, in its January 11, 1999, issue, ran the headline "Saddam + Bin Laden." The subhead declared, "America's two enemies are courting." The article was written by Christopher Dickey, Gregory Vistica, Russell Watson, and Joseph Contreras. The authors cited reports from an "Arab intelligence source" about the alliance.

According to this source, Saddam expected last month's American and British bombing campaign to go on much longer than it did. The dictator believed that as the attacks continued, indignation would grow in the Muslim world, making his terrorism offensive both harder to trace and more effective. With acts of terror contributing to chaos in the region, Turkey, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait might feel less inclined to support Washington. Saddam's long-term strategy, according to several sources, is to bully or cajole Muslim countries into breaking the embargo against Iraq, without waiting for the United Nations to lift it formally.

(Interestingly, after Colin Powell's presentation last month to the U.N. Security Council linking Hussein and al Qaeda, Dickey reversed course and referred to the evidence of these links as "egregious smokescreens.")

The timing here is critical. Operation "Desert Fox" began on December 16, 1998, and ended after just 70 hours, on December 19, 1998. Two days later, Hijazi was dispatched to meet with al Qaeda leaders. And the Newsweek report detailing the increased collaboration appeared shortly thereafter. And it wasn't just Newsweek.

In fact, Time magazine, in an issue also out January 11, 1999, one-upped its competitor by quoting bin Laden himself on the Iraq issue. "There is no doubt that the treacherous attack has confirmed that Britain and America are acting on behalf of Israel and the Jews, paving the way for the Jews to divide the Muslim world once again, enslave it and loot the rest of its wealth. A great part of the force that carried out the attack came from certain Gulf countries that have lost their sovereignty."

U.S. intelligence officials who have expressed skepticism about a Hussein-bin Laden relationship often point to religious differences as the reason for their doubts. Hussein was secular, they say, bin Laden a fundamentalist. True enough. But, as bin Laden's comments suggest, there were bigger concerns--that America and "the Jews" might "divide the Muslim world once again"--that would trump these differences and unite the two men against a common enemy.

The Hijazi meeting wasn't the only Iraq-al Qaeda around that time. Eleven months before bin Laden spoke to Time, then-President Bill Clinton traveled to the Pentagon, where he gave a speech preparing the nation for war with Iraq. Clinton told the world that Saddam Hussein would work with an "unholy axis of terrorists, drug traffickers, and organized international criminals." His warning was stern.

We have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st century. . . . They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein.

The timing, once again, is critical. Clinton's speech came on February 18, 1998. The next day, according to documents uncovered earlier this week in Baghdad, Saddam Hussein reached out to bin Laden. A document dated February 19, 1998, and labeled "Top Secret and Urgent" tells of a plan for an al Qaeda operative to travel from Sudan to Iraq for talks with Iraqi intelligence. The memo focused on Saudi Arabia, another common bin Laden and Hussein foe, and declared that the Mukhabarat would pick up "all the travel and hotel costs inside Iraq to gain the knowledge of the message from bin Laden and to convey to his envoy an oral message from us to bin Laden." The document further explained that the message "would relate to the future of our relationship with him, bin Laden, and to achieve a direct meeting with him." The document also held open the possibility that the al Qaeda representative could be "a way to maintain contacts with bin Laden."

There is certainly much more to learn about the "contacts with bin Laden" after this meeting. What is clear, though, is that it is no longer defensible to claim there were no contacts. The skeptics, including many at the CIA, who argued that previous evidence of such links was not compelling, ought to be convinced now. They may well argue that, given the timing of the contacts, Saddam reached out to al Qaeda only when he felt threatened. The facts as we know them today are consistent with such a conclusion. But as journalists continue to pore over documents, and military analysts begin to do the same, it would be hasty to imagine that we've already uncovered everything there is to find on the bin Laden-Saddam tie.

Whatever the differences between al Qaeda and the Iraqi regime, the two shared a hatred of America. One Iraqi official, some weeks after the September 11 attacks, publicly criticized the United States for rooting out al Qaeda in Afghanistan. The official was quoted in a report in broken English carried on The Pakistan Newswire of October 29, 2001, which said: "He stressed the US to stop bombardment on Afghanistan resulting in death of innocent children, women and elderly people." The official, who had been in his job since 1999, also expressed doubt that bin Laden was even a terrorist and responsible for 9/11. He "said the US President Bush should knock the door of international court of justice to address the situation because only court had authority to declare Prime suspect of September 11 tragedy 'Osama Bin Laden' terrorist or not.'"

You might recognize the official's name. It was published in Babil last fall: Abd-al-Karim Muhammad Aswad, "intelligence officer, official in charge of regime's contacts with Osama bin Laden's group and currently the regime's representative in Pakistan."


Stephen F. Hayes is a staff writer at The Weekly Standard.

Casey

so it would seem that Sheik Bashir had a vision about one of Saddam's sons dying. also mentioned in this thread is Zuhair the Flavor (another visionary and writer) with regard to al-Madi and OBL

whole thread

A realization part of the Nagdi Bashir vision around Saddam 's loss is one of his sons

23-7-2003 02:28

Yesterday was I intend I to raise a subject he concerns what came in the ÇáÑÄì concerning Saddam Hussein and my specially that vision and if that I a six of the enthusiasts of the áÑÄì and that became the forums abounding with her, and only the vision of his one pulled me and the Nagdi the sheikh Bashir has explained her that Allah kept him, have presented to him vision and her discussion completed and the sheikh explained her and that was during the fall of Baghdad approximation and she that Saddam will disappears and will lose one of his sons then is for him the triumph, the state nature what happened today in Mosul

and resulted from him the claim of the American forces of the abolition strong probability on Saddam Hussein 's sons a far is Wadi, the operation is her nothing wrong with it but the doubts were still turning around the victims of that operation, then the Americans appeared really that eliminated them or that she not except then his ponds the target from her a media person for conversion of the destination of the knowledgeable Ria indignant on them then they say there we achieved the achievement of a precious yard, was still mention that he before Iraq occupation said that Ben Laden is besieged in they weighed a metre and he

became his cache a favour, and clarified later on that she is not except a storm and transference of the viewpoint of the general Ria, as for if the news was perfect then believed and do not assert that there is a single casualty from Saddam 's sons and the science at Allah that Uday is according to what the masses media and the testimony of the eyewitnesses and that handled to a simple cause to the regime poles universe We can the saying

all of the indication points that Saddam is Alsfiani and he was not remain from the marks except the descent of the Turks between the two rivers as mentioned in heel Hadith ( they want the Turks the island ( between the two rivers ) until they water their Îíæáåã from Euphrates then Allah sends on them the plague then kills them then does not escape from them one ) and the more likely is that he will use a bacterial weapon and Allah know the pearls necklace Õ are 155 .

The United States of America accomplished a round in the negotiations of his secrets for a permission for the entrance of the Turks in north of Iraq under the pretext of the abolition of the Kurd labour party and this is the pretext of his diseases of the Turkish and American and soon parties you will see Turkish forcing lodges in north of Iraq and by this a formation all of the indication that confirms on Sfiania Saddam has become complete and have happened before and to she wrote a subject in this regard that find him on this connection

She studied the Shiites sources then found by their books what directs Alsfiani 's appearance and if that some of their sources confirm that he have get out in the Abbasid age and this is not right as that I found him in their sources an evil it is a must from him and these are digests of their books on what came in Alsfiani plenty of her coincides with what informed him that in the Sunna books, to a degree they say that he appears in Rajab and he rules nine months and Alsfiani succeeds him the second .

45 - Alsfiani 's departure in Damascus ( year 195 åÜ ) in the year of 195 åÜ of saddlebag Alsfiani in Damascus, and his name Ali bin Abdullah Khaled Bn Yazid Bn Mu'awiyah 's son and invited to himself him with the caliphate, and he mastered Suleiman bin Al-Mansur Damascus worker then extracted him from her, then marched to him Al Amin Alabasi Al-Husayn bin Ali Eissa bin Mahan 's son then he reached the tenderness and was not move to Damascus . Then verily Alsfiani met Baihas son in a battle, then Alsfiani 's army was defeated and killed from them thousand man and families of three thousands, then Alsfiani weakened and he was besieged in Damascus, a there she hid between him and between Ibn Bayhas 's army battles several, then Alsfiani 's army was being defeated every time, a there besieged the son of Damascus Baihs and an income her then Alsfiani 's escape in the women garments to I ÃáãÒå him at the end of Damascus ( 66 ) .

What came in Alsfiana 's mention and that his harder is from the inevitable and that he before standing the standing peace be upon him

1 -Ahmad Bn Mohammad bin Said Ibn Aqda informed us that said : Mohammad Bn Almfdl narrated me a coffee bean

Ibrahim Bn Qays is pomegranate son from his book in Ragab a year of sixty five and two hundreds, said : Al-Hassan Bn Ali talked to us a coffee bean then stray, said : Thalaba bin Maimun Abu Isaac talked to us, about Eissa eyes son I about Abdullah 's father ( peace be upon him ) that he said : Alsfiani from the inevitable and his departure in Ragab and from his first rebellion to a last fifteen month, six months he fights in her, then if he possessed Alkor the five king nine months, and he was not exceed her a day .

[ we informed ] Ahmad Bn Mohammad Bn Said said : Al-Qassem Bn Mohammad Bn Al-Hassan Ibn Hazem narrated us from his book, said : Abis bin Hisham talked to us, about the cross-eyed Mohammad Bn Bishr, about Abdullah Ibn Jabalah, about Eissa eyes son I about Mali bin Khnis, said : she heard Abdullah 's father ( peace be upon him ) he says : from the order an inevitable and from him Malis by an inevitable and from the inevitable Alsfiani 's departure in Ragab .

Ahmad Bn Mohammad bin Said Ibn Aqda narrated us that said : Ali Bn Al-Hassan narrated us that a long period of time is in Safar a year of seventy four and two hundreds, said : Al-Hassan Bn Mahbub narrated us, about Ubay Ayoub Alkhzaz, about Mohammad Bn Muslim that said : she heard Aba Jaafar Albaqr ( peace be upon him ) he says : they avoided Allah and seek help on what are you on him with the piety and the diligence in the obedience of Allah, then a severer what ones of you are a delight what he in him from the religion if he have become in the afterlife border, and the world abandoned him, then if he in that limit knew that he have received the bliss and the miracle from Allah and the good news by the heaven and a security which was fearing, and he ascertained that the one that was on him is the truth, and that who contradicted his religion on an invalid, and that he is dead, then you rejoice, then rejoice by the one that want, not seeing enemies quantity they fight in Allah disobedience, and he kills some of them some on the world without you and you are in your houses safes in an isolation about them, and sufficed by Alsfiani a resentment for you ( 1 ) from your enemy and he from the marks for you, with that the sinful if he has get out you stayed for a month or two after his departure that was not on you by an exponent until he is killed a manners many .

Then he said for him some of his owners : then how we make by the ÇáÚíÇá if he was that ¿ he said : the men are absent .

She strived in the Sunnis talks and what he matches from the refusing Hadiths : that Alsfiani gets out of the dry burying alive and to an existence she mistook my subject in the past that have pointed that the dry in Tikrit burying alive but the rightest is a Bbladalsham near Damascus, and she mentioned that he may be Saddam 's departure in the revolution of 68 DAY of but in him indications that confirms that he entered Syria after the disclosure of the figures brother by Abdo Hamoud 's telephone clash secretary and the follow-up of this figure and a fondness completed inside the Syrian lands and the American forces have carry out convoy bombardment for her belief by that Saddam on her deck, if he was Saddam 's action an income Damascus and gets out of her my second in the name of we know him and he is Alsfiani and with other invitation contrary what we knew him about him previously then by this a formation the equation postulates have ended .

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

also see bashir.zip

Casey

The jihad appeared in Iraq that contradicts the fighters Mohammad 's island ( Õ )

( ( ( my question do the jihad in Iraq be in the two holy mosques countries and after them the Al-Mahdi ) ) )
================================================== ===========
And at her Saddam starts in an invasion of the lands of hypocrites and apostates a – means the rulers - the one who helped him the Americans, what in her Jordan, and he enters Palestine - also a – for the fighting of the Jewish, and he kills in them his killing is great, then if he enters the Arabian Peninsula, men from the sections face him from the fighters the heroes break his thorn but they do not manage the abolition of him until if the Hashemi gets out a – means Al-Mahdi - he sent to him a dispatch then killed him and Saddam may be put to death and back him one of his sons so that she stands between him and between Al-Mahdi 's army are this battle, in addition to the army who eclipses by him when he means to guided to his fighting God knows best .
================================================== ===========


Allah is the greatest : # # # as said the Nagdi the sheikh Bashir ( ( Sdam gets out and have lost one of his sons ) )

The In the name of Allah Most Gracious Most Merciful

There a meeting have carried out him our brother ( ( Mohammad ) ) God bless him .. With the Nagdi the righteous sheikh Bashir .Allah kept him and paid back him ...

And he was the address of this meeting ( ( the legitimate and future consideration ) )

And he was in the meeting many of the questions around the explosions of Riyadh and around the sedition that will fall between Salool 's families,, and there are questions around sheikh Osama 's hit ..Allah supported him .. And there also questions around Sdam 's departure once again to the lawyer ..

Then he was this question that translates him to you without an increase and no decrease,,,

=================================
Saddam Hussein and the expectations his affair

Mohammad :
Our righteous sheikh before we end this meeting by a sperm if she talked us little about Iraq and about Saddam Hussein, and what expect his occurrence is two structures on what and your answer from the ÇáÑÄì God bless you ¿

-------------------------------

The sheikh :
The fact is that the mentioned ÇáÑÄì in this regard direct that the defeat cause that fell is a treachery from some Saddam 's men and this defeat she will form a good to the Muslims to Allah wanted, America will penetrate in Iraq until if what thought that the matter may settle of her in Iraq she was surprised with Saddam 's departure and with him strong faithful men, extracts about him and about his nation the sadness dress that reigned over them for a period of time, ( ( ( Saddam gets out and have lost many one of his sons and that Saddam do not depend on him ) ) ), and extracts Saddam Rafaan two generals and a slogan he differs about what he was on him from before, then the ÇáÑÄì direct that he yearns for the knowledge of truth and compliance by him and therefore he may appear by the Islam garment and no good in Alsfiani except by the Islam, he gets out that so that he leads fierce battles against the crusade presence oppresses they them the tyrant tyranny and he destines Allah Glory be to Him to him that at this time of helps him in his war against these crosses, and may be a shake Ç the assisting element a country from the adjacent countries or a more, and may be this element consisted in the fighting God knows best, and while the war her ÑÍÇáåÇ turns on Iraq land and if she by the satellites reports for us the great news in the tyrant taking revenge - he became great and a – and his tyranny against America rose, and what will result in her from a destruction and is this is a support from Ç

And by Allah but Whom there is no god she finds at me from the ÇáÑÄì what directs this and she from the people of the confidences of addition confirmation on what come from the ÇáÑÄì by means of the network, then we ask Allah the most Exalted that he accelerates the enabling and the appearance in this weak nation and that reaches us today and rejoices our eyes are by him .

I beg for the brotherhood the nobles the organs and until our righteous sheikh doctor Mohammad Almsari she benefitted us rewarded
And peace, mercy and blessings of Allah be upon you him

Casey

Fri, August 8, 2003
Osama behind Iraq bombing?
By HRVOJE HRANJSKI


BAGHDAD (AP) - U.S. officials said Friday a suspect in the car bombing of the Jordanian Embassy, which killed 19 people, was a group linked to Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida terror network. Officials said they could not rule out similar terror attacks against Baghdad's diplomats.

U.S. snipers killed two suspected arms dealers in a Tikrit market. The victims, shot from more than 100 metre away, apparently were not immediately threatening American forces and were given no opportunity to surrender.

The military also said a U.S. soldier was killed Thursday night in west Baghdad while on guard duty. It was not clear, the army said, if the soldier was attacked or shot accidentally.

Lt. Gen. Norton Schwartz, director of operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told U.S.-run Radio Sawa, which broadcasts to the Middle East in Arabic, that authorities were looking at Ansar al-Islam as a potential suspect in Thursday's embassy bombing.

Schwartz and coalition spokesmen in Baghdad said U.S. forces and Iraqi police were investigating the bombing, the first major terrorist attack since Baghdad fell to American forces April 9. They refused to comment on progress.

"I think the one organization that we have confidence (in) and that we know is in Iraq and in the Baghdad area is Ansar al-Islam," Schwartz said. "It is unknown whether this particular organization was associated with the (bombing). Perhaps that'll become clear as we go down the road.

"But that is an Al Qaida-related organization and one that we are focusing attention on."

Ansar was knocked out of action early in the Iraq war. Its main headquarters in northeastern Iraq near the Iranian border was wiped out by U.S. bombing.

But the organization has been reconstituting in Iraq, with members who survived the attack filtering back into the country from Iran, Paul Bremer, the U.S. administrator of occupied Iraq, told a recent news conference.

Coalition spokesman Charles Heatly said the security of 35 foreign missions in Baghdad is the responsibility of Iraqi police and the diplomats.

"We have always said that there were threats to this country in terms of diplomats in this country and city while there are still a few remnants of the . . . regime intent on derailing the progress in this country," Heatly said. "It's clearly possible that they may target diplomatic missions."

More than 50 people were wounded in the explosion at the embassy in Baghdad, which set cars on fire, flung the hulk of one vehicle onto a rooftop and broke windows hundreds of metres away.

On Friday, the Jordanian flag flew at half-mast. Two Humvees kept the area sealed off. U.S. Sgt. 1st Class Chris Lynch said the Iraqis and Americans were co-operating in the investigation.

So far, U.S. authorities have said, they do not believe terrorist groups like Ansar or any other foreign fighters have played a major role in the guerrilla war against American occupation forces.

They believe, instead, that those attacks are the work of remnants of the regime of deposed president Saddam Hussein - his Republican Guard, Fedayeen Saddam militia and intelligence services.

There was concern the attack might signal that violence in Iraq was taking on a second face. Until Thursday's explosion, the only organized violence in the country was directed against U.S. forces, remotely detonated roadside bombs and rocket-propelled grenade and Kalashnikov automatic rifle attacks.

"What this shows is that, in fact, we have some terrorists that are operating here," U.S. Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, commander of U.S.-led forces in Iraq, told a news conference. "It shows we are still in a conflict zone."

The military reported Friday that a U.S. soldier died from a gunshot in western Baghdad the night before. Authorities said they had not yet determined if the soldier was killed in an attack or died in an accidental shooting. Two soldiers died Wednesday night in an attack in the centre of Baghdad, ending a four-day period in which the military had reported no U.S. forces killed in combat.

Also Friday, U.S. snipers killed two men and wounded two others in a raid on a weapons market in Saddam's home town of Tikrit, witnesses and military officials said.

Women ran screaming as they heard the shots and saw a man who was unloading AK-47 assault rifles from the trunk of a red sedan fall to the ground, according to a witness who was selling biscuits.

U.S. forces had positioned snipers around the market after hearing that weapons and ammunition were sold there every Friday, said Lt. Col. Steve Russell, whose regiment executed the operation.

"We didn't give them a chance to engage us. If you walk around with weapons in a city, you become a combatant. The rules are very clear," Russell said.

Dr. Mohammed al-Jubori, chief physician at the Tikrit Teaching Hospital, said three people were killed. He said two died in the market and a third, shot in the head, died while being treated at the hospital. He said five were wounded, including a 10-year-old boy shot in the leg and hit in the head with shrapnel.

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2.../156467-ap.html

__________________
~Casey

The current ItsHappening forum is here:
http://wincoast.com/forum/index.php

WorldAnalysis.net
http://worldanalysis.net

Casey

Iraq 'supplied al-Qaeda with WMDs'
From correspondents in Crawford, Texas
09aug03

A HIGH-RANKING al-Qaeda operative in custody disclosed that Iraq supplied the Islamist militant group with material to build chemical and biological weapons, the White House said today.

"A senior al-Qaeda terrorist, now detained, who had been responsible for al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan, reports that al-Qaeda was intent on obtaining (weapons of mass destruction) assistance from Iraq," the White House said in a report.
The 25 page document was released as US President George W Bush holidayed at his Texas ranch.

The Bush administration cited links between al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein's Baath party regime as justification for attacking Iraq to oust Saddam. The administration also insisted Saddam had chemical and biological weapons and was pursuing nuclear weapons.

The report quoted the unnamed prisoner as saying al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden turned to Iraq after concluding his group could not produce chemical or biological weapons on its own in Afghanistan.

"Iraq agreed to provide chemical and biological weapons training for two al-Qaeda associates starting in December 2000," the report said.

"Senior al-Qaeda associate Abu Musab al-Zarqawi came to Baghdad in May 2002 for medical treatment, along with approximately two dozen al-Qaeda terrorist associates.

"This group stayed in Baghdad and other parts of Iraq and plotted terrorist attacks around the world."

The report, quoting the US State Department, also says the fallen regime of Saddam Hussein "provided material assistance to Palestinian terrorist groups, including the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command, Hamas and the Palestine Islamic Jihad".

The Saddam regime, says the report, "posed a threat to the security of the United States and the world. With the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime, a leader who pursued, used and possessed weapons of mass destruction is no longer in power".

Since May 1, when Bush declared the combat in Iraq effectively over, occupation forces have found no conclusive evidence of Baghdad's banned weapons programs in spite of intensive searches.

© The Australian

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.a...255E401,00.html

__________________
~Casey

The current ItsHappening forum is here:
http://wincoast.com/forum/index.php

WorldAnalysis.net
http://worldanalysis.net